  |
 |
 |
 |
Welcome to ONEYODA'S WORLD.
|
 |
Yucca Mountain
|
 |
|
 |
An Independent View
Yucca's
engineering unsound
The following is
excerpted from Science magazine. It was released April 26 and was written by Rodney Ewing and Allison Macfarlane, two scientists
who are considered to be friendly to the nuclear power industry.
The Secretary of Energy, in his recommendation
to the president, maintained that "sound science" supports the (Yucca) decision.
However, during the past eight months
three government agencies have reviewed the suitability of a Yucca Mountain repository and have issued a series of revealing
reports. In September of last year, the Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission issued a
report that, among other points, concluded that the total system performance assessment in support of the site recommendation
"relies on modeling assumptions that mask a realistic assessment of risk" and that "computations and analyses are assumption-based,
not evidence-supported."
Last December, the General Accounting Office concluded that, "DOE will not be able to submit
an acceptable application to NRC within the express statutory time frames for several years because it will take that long
to resolve many technical issues."
This past January, the Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board expressed "limited confidence
in current performance estimates" and found the technical basis for the repository performance estimates to be "weak to moderate."
In
the face of the scientific uncertainties about the site, there is a surprising sense of urgency to move forward with a positive
decision on Yucca Mountain as a nuclear waste repository. In the coming months, utilities that own nuclear power plants and
states that have spent nuclear fuel stored at the reactors will press hard for action to approve the Yucca Mountain site,
their concern heightened by fears of terrorist attacks on the storage facilities. Some have argued that the future of nuclear
power is at risk in the absence of a positive decision.
The present sense of urgency is driven not by an understanding
of the properties of the Yucca Mountain site, but rather by larger-scale policy decisions concerning nuclear power and national
security. Decades of effort costing billions of dollars, and, in fact, our entire site-specific regulatory framework are now
at risk if we do not accept Yucca Mountain as a repository.
The present decision to make Yucca Mountain a repository
for high-level nuclear waste is a political decision ...
In our view, the disposal of high-level nuclear waste at Yucca
Mountain is based on an unsound engineering strategy and poor use of present understanding of the properties of spent nuclear
fuel.
|
|
Click Here for INTERACTIVE MAP, and see how close the NUCULAR WASTE COMES TO YOUR HOMES AND CITIES.
Citizen Alert encourages all Americans with sufficient Internet and computer access to
look up their address on this system to determine how close their homes are to proposed transport routes. Users can also learn
how many schools, hospitals, and people in their state are within one mile of a transport route, as well as state- and nation-wide
statistics on truck and train accidents, including rollovers and fatalities.
EWG was not able to make the site accessible to all browsers. For those of you unable to view the
maps with your browser, here are some locations of interest:Locations of Interest, Listed By Closest To Routes First
-
Disneyland 1313 Harbor Boulevard, Anaheim, CA 92803 0.1 miles from from nearest nuclear
waste transport route. Nothing adds fun to a family vacation like radiation exposure! And an accident could provide more
fun than you had planned for; ask the kids if they'd like to try the rides in Evacuation Land.
-
The White House 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, Washington DC 20500 1.1 miles from nearest
nuclear waste transport route. Makes you wonder what Bush is thinking, doesn't it?
-
Sears Tower 233 S Wacker Dr, Chicago, IL 60606 1.2 miles from nearest nuclear waste
transport route. This highlight of Chicago's skyline sits right by the path of nuclear waste transportation, as do all
of the surrounding buildings. A catastrophic accident here would cost many lives.
-
Daytona Beach International Airport 700 Catalina Dr, Daytona Beach, FL 32114 1.7
miles from nearest nuclear waste transport route. What an unforgettable Spring Break party or golf trip it would be if
you had to contend with a nuclear waste accident!
-
The Cabildo 701 Charters St, New Orleans, LA 70116 2.0 miles from nearest nuclear
waste transport route. The site of the signing of the Louisiana Purchase in 1803, in the historic French Quarter of New
Orleans. And you thought the humidity was icky!
-
Dwight D. Eisenhower Presidential Library and Museum 200 SE 4th St, Abilene, KS 67410 2.0
miles from nearest nuclear waste transport route. One of many presidential libraries around the country, this one would
be in danger during a nearby nuclear waste spill.
-
Citizen Alert's Las Vegas Office 1700 Desert Inn Road, Las Vegas NV 2.3 miles from
nearest nuclear waste transport route. Naturally, we're not happy about it.
-
Cisco Systems' Research Triangle Park Office 7025 Kit Creek Rd, Morrisville, NC 27560 2.4
miles from nearest nuclear waste transport route. This is but one of many companies in Research Triangle Park, not to mention prestigious schools such as Duke University. Thousands of some of
the world's top researchers and their families live and work in this area, not to mention the billions of dollars invested
in the research that goes on there. What a loss that would be if there were to be a major nuclear accident on the highway
running through the RTP!
- New York Stock Exchange
11 Wall St, New York, NY 10005 9.7 miles from nearest nuclear waste
transport route. Far away compared to other locations listed here, although still within 10 miles. Imagine the economic
impact if the winds blew the right way after a serious accident.
|
|
|